Design · Manager

the numbers

n=6 · effective weight 4.86

communication

3.29

fairness

3.03

supports growth

3.37

work-life

3.41

would work for again

3.64

overall rating

3.35 / 5

confidence

0.501

σ 0.35

One rating per group per account. You may edit or delete from your dashboard.

2025-12-16[hard-verified · work email][avg 3.8]c:5 f:2 g:4 wl:3 rec:5currentworked: 2023 – present
A lot of the good stuff was informal - hallway conversations, quick DMs, a shared spreadsheet. Not everything is repeatable.
2025-11-10[soft-verified · web match][avg 3.4]c:3 f:2 g:4 wl:5 rec:3formerworked: 2023 – 2024
Meetings could have been half as long. Someone always felt the need to recap what we just said.
2025-05-15[hard-verified · work email][avg 3.6]c:3 f:5 g:3 wl:3 rec:4formerworked: 2023 – present
Hiring bar was high, but the interview loop was respectful. No trick questions, no gotchas.
2025-02-05[unverified][avg 3.0]c:3 f:3 g:3 wl:3 rec:3formerworked: 2024 – present
You will hear a lot of ambitious talk here. Some of it lands, some of it does not.
2024-06-07[unverified][avg 4.0]c:2 f:5 g:4 wl:4 rec:5formerworked: 2022 – present
The lead was consistent. What they said in one-on-ones matched what they said in group settings. That built trust fast.
2024-04-18[unverified][avg 3.4]c:2 f:3 g:3 wl:5 rec:4formerworked: 2021 – 2023
Some fair criticism: hiring outpaced onboarding capacity, and new folks felt lost for their first month.