companies » LTIMindtree » group

Marketing · Manager

Mumbai · at LTIMindtree

the numbers

n=9 · effective weight 7.62

communication

3.28

fairness

2.87

supports growth

2.94

work-life

3.13

would work for again

3.56

overall rating

3.16 / 5

confidence

0.86

σ 0.194

worked in this group?

One rating per group per account. You may edit or delete from your dashboard.

what people said (n=9)

2026-05-28[unverified][avg 3.4]c:2 f:4 g:3 wl:4 rec:4formerworked: 2023 – present
Peer reviews were the most useful signal I got. Manager reviews were a summary at best.
2026-05-18[hard-verified · work email][avg 3.4]c:5 f:2 g:2 wl:4 rec:4formerworked: 2022 – 2022
The manager knew when to step in and when to step out. That balance is harder than it looks.
2026-02-06[hard-verified · work email][avg 2.8]c:2 f:3 g:4 wl:2 rec:3currentworked: 2021 – 2025
You could ask a stupid question in standup and nobody made you feel small for it.
2025-02-09[unverified][avg 3.4]c:4 f:2 g:5 wl:2 rec:4currentworked: 2022 – 2025
Culture varied wildly across pods. Ask about your specific team, not the company brand.
2025-02-07[soft-verified · web match][avg 3.2]c:3 f:3 g:3 wl:2 rec:5formerworked: 2021 – present
The playbook was constantly being rewritten. Fun if you like ambiguity, exhausting if you dont.
2024-10-27[unverified][avg 3.2]c:4 f:3 g:2 wl:3 rec:4currentworked: 2024 – 2024
Meeting hygiene was terrible for my first six months, then a lead cleaned it up in one week.
2024-10-21[unverified][avg 3.2]c:3 f:4 g:2 wl:4 rec:3currentworked: 2023 – present
Career progression was slower than I hoped but the work I did was substantial.
2024-09-13[soft-verified · web match][avg 3.2]c:4 f:2 g:2 wl:3 rec:5formerworked: 2022 – present
Growth path for people managers was clear. IC path had gaps that were awkward to navigate.
2024-02-15[soft-verified · web match][avg 3.4]c:4 f:3 g:3 wl:5 rec:2formerworked: 2024 – 2024
Perks were fine. What kept me around was the manager and the team, not the snacks.