Product · Manager

the numbers

n=6 · effective weight 4.06

communication

3.39

fairness

2.79

supports growth

3.35

work-life

3.39

would work for again

3.39

overall rating

3.26 / 5

confidence

0.348

σ 0.628

One rating per group per account. You may edit or delete from your dashboard.

2025-10-01[soft-verified · web match][avg 3.6]c:4 f:2 g:2 wl:5 rec:5formerworked: 2021 – present
The lead treated the team like adults. That sounds low bar and it is not as common as it should be.
2025-09-20[hard-verified · work email][avg 3.8]c:5 f:3 g:5 wl:2 rec:4formerworked: 2023 – 2025
I stayed longer than I planned because the people were good. Left when the people started leaving.
2025-02-18[unverified][avg 3.6]c:3 f:3 g:5 wl:5 rec:2currentworked: 2024 – 2022
PIP process was more supportive than punitive. The person who went through it actually recovered.
2024-10-19[unverified][avg 3.0]c:2 f:3 g:3 wl:5 rec:2formerworked: 2022 – present
You would not learn cutting-edge tech here but you would learn how to build robust systems at scale.
2024-06-21[soft-verified · web match][avg 2.2]c:2 f:2 g:3 wl:2 rec:2formerworked: 2024 – present
A few loud voices dominated the culture conversation. It was fine most of the time, but not always.
2024-04-05[unverified][avg 3.8]c:3 f:3 g:3 wl:5 rec:5currentworked: 2021 – 2023
Documentation was chaotic. Half the tribal knowledge lived in one senior engineers head.