Engineering · Lead
Bengaluru · at Postman
the numbers
n=5 · effective weight 3.65communication
3.61
fairness
3.56
supports growth
3.41
work-life
3.01
would work for again
3.43
overall rating
3.4 / 5
confidence
0.357
σ 0.434
worked in this group?
register to postOne rating per group per account. You may edit or delete from your dashboard.
what people said (n=5)
- 2026-05-31[unverified][avg 3.2]c:5 f:3 g:3 wl:3 rec:2formerworked: 2021 – 2023
Peer reviews were the most useful signal I got. Manager reviews were a summary at best.
- 2025-01-25[soft-verified · web match][avg 3.8]c:2 f:4 g:5 wl:3 rec:5currentworked: 2023 – 2023
The senior IC track was as respected as the manager track. That is genuinely rare.
- 2024-10-01[hard-verified · work email][avg 3.8]c:4 f:5 g:4 wl:2 rec:4currentworked: 2022 – 2022
A few loud voices dominated the culture conversation. It was fine most of the time, but not always.
- 2024-07-31[soft-verified · web match][avg 4.4]c:5 f:4 g:3 wl:5 rec:5formerworked: 2022 – 2025
The playbook was constantly being rewritten. Fun if you like ambiguity, exhausting if you dont.
- 2024-04-01[unverified][avg 4.0]c:5 f:5 g:4 wl:2 rec:4formerworked: 2023 – 2022
Team offsites were substantive, not just team-building nonsense. We actually resolved real issues.