Growth · Senior Manager
Bengaluru · at Mphasis
the numbers
n=10 · effective weight 9.07worked in this group?
register to postOne rating per group per account. You may edit or delete from your dashboard.
what people said (n=10)
- 2026-06-08[soft-verified · web match][avg 3.2]c:3 f:4 g:4 wl:2 rec:3formerworked: 2022 – present
When we missed a target, the conversation was about what to change, not who to blame.
- 2026-05-28[unverified][avg 3.4]c:3 f:5 g:2 wl:5 rec:2currentworked: 2023 – present
The bar for feedback was high. Vague praise was called out; specific critique was welcomed.
- 2025-12-19[unverified][avg 3.2]c:2 f:2 g:5 wl:2 rec:5formerworked: 2021 – 2025
Skip-levels were real and useful. My skip actually remembered what I said between meetings.
- 2025-11-13[soft-verified · web match][avg 3.0]c:4 f:2 g:3 wl:4 rec:2formerworked: 2022 – present
Team norms were written down and revisited. That helped a lot when new folks joined.
- 2025-09-29[hard-verified · work email][avg 4.0]c:3 f:5 g:5 wl:4 rec:3formerworked: 2024 – 2023
The org invested in tooling in a way most companies talk about but never actually do.
- 2025-08-09[soft-verified · web match][avg 4.2]c:2 f:5 g:5 wl:4 rec:5currentworked: 2023 – 2022
Great place for the first three years, then the reorg drained the good will. YMMV after new leadership.
- 2025-03-05[unverified][avg 4.4]c:4 f:5 g:5 wl:4 rec:4formerworked: 2022 – present
The pace was intense but the outcomes were real. I built things I am still proud of.
- 2024-08-25[unverified][avg 3.0]c:4 f:4 g:2 wl:2 rec:3formerworked: 2021 – 2025
Growth conversations happened once a year and then evaporated. Follow-through was the weak spot.
- 2024-02-25[unverified][avg 4.4]c:4 f:4 g:4 wl:5 rec:5currentworked: 2022 – 2022
Salary review conversations were held before the number was locked in. That felt unusually adult.
- 2024-02-24[unverified][avg 4.0]c:5 f:5 g:2 wl:3 rec:5formerworked: 2024 – present
Onboarding buddy program was excellent. I still get coffee with mine two years later.