Growth · Director

Gurgaon · at Meesho

the numbers

n=8 · effective weight 7.65

communication

3.67

fairness

3.21

supports growth

3.46

work-life

3.10

would work for again

2.74

overall rating

3.24 / 5

confidence

0.654

σ 0.632

One rating per group per account. You may edit or delete from your dashboard.

2026-03-23[unverified][avg 2.6]c:4 f:2 g:2 wl:3 rec:2formerworked: 2024 – present
People stayed late because they wanted to, not because someone was watching. That is a real distinction.
2026-01-21[soft-verified · web match][avg 3.0]c:4 f:3 g:3 wl:2 rec:3currentworked: 2022 – 2022
Great place for the first three years, then the reorg drained the good will. YMMV after new leadership.
2025-12-27[unverified][avg 3.8]c:5 f:2 g:4 wl:5 rec:3currentworked: 2023 – 2022
Great place to be an IC. Management track was less clearly defined.
2025-12-18[unverified][avg 3.0]c:3 f:3 g:3 wl:4 rec:2currentworked: 2022 – present
Roadmap changed too often for anyone to plan a quarter. Strategy was the missing conversation.
2025-10-23[soft-verified · web match][avg 3.0]c:2 f:4 g:4 wl:2 rec:3formerworked: 2022 – 2022
Culture varied wildly across pods. Ask about your specific team, not the company brand.
2025-05-30[unverified][avg 3.6]c:5 f:3 g:4 wl:4 rec:2formerworked: 2023 – 2024
Design and eng were treated as equals in the room. Roadmap arguments were actually productive.
2025-01-18[soft-verified · web match][avg 3.6]c:4 f:5 g:5 wl:2 rec:2formerworked: 2023 – present
Honestly a mixed bag. Great mentors on one project, then a rough manager the next quarter.
2024-12-20[soft-verified · web match][avg 4.6]c:5 f:5 g:5 wl:4 rec:4currentworked: 2023 – present
The team ran a proper post-mortem on failed launches. Blameless in practice, not just in the doc.