Product · Lead

Bengaluru · at Mphasis

the numbers

n=8 · effective weight 8.68

communication

2.84

fairness

3.66

supports growth

3.50

work-life

3.33

would work for again

3.49

overall rating

3.37 / 5

confidence

0.8

σ 0.399

One rating per group per account. You may edit or delete from your dashboard.

2026-07-18[unverified][avg 3.0]c:2 f:2 g:2 wl:5 rec:4currentworked: 2021 – 2023
The team ran hot on some quarters and calm on others. It was mostly predictable and mostly humane.
2026-03-20[hard-verified · work email][avg 3.4]c:3 f:4 g:4 wl:2 rec:4formerworked: 2022 – 2023
Salary review conversations were held before the number was locked in. That felt unusually adult.
2025-12-06[unverified][avg 3.6]c:2 f:5 g:4 wl:4 rec:3formerworked: 2024 – 2025
Growth path for people managers was clear. IC path had gaps that were awkward to navigate.
2025-11-20[unverified][avg 3.2]c:3 f:4 g:5 wl:2 rec:2currentworked: 2021 – present
Work life was fine until quarter-end, then it was fine again. Nothing outrageous.
2025-09-19[soft-verified · web match][avg 3.2]c:2 f:3 g:2 wl:4 rec:5formerworked: 2023 – 2022
This is a good place if you want to become a better collaborator. It is a hard place if you want to be a lone wolf.
2025-08-02[unverified][avg 3.8]c:4 f:4 g:3 wl:5 rec:3currentworked: 2022 – 2024
The bar for feedback was high. Vague praise was called out; specific critique was welcomed.
2025-07-26[hard-verified · work email][avg 4.2]c:4 f:5 g:5 wl:3 rec:4currentworked: 2023 – present
Perks were fine. What kept me around was the manager and the team, not the snacks.
2024-05-14[soft-verified · web match][avg 3.8]c:2 f:5 g:5 wl:4 rec:3currentworked: 2023 – 2025
Compensation review was more collaborative than any previous job. My concerns were listened to seriously.