companies » Pine Labs » group

Customer Support · Head

Noida · at Pine Labs

the numbers

n=9 · effective weight 9.19

communication

3.89

fairness

3.17

supports growth

4.06

work-life

3.26

would work for again

3.76

overall rating

3.63 / 5

confidence

0.789

σ 0.422

worked in this group?

One rating per group per account. You may edit or delete from your dashboard.

what people said (n=9)

2026-07-02[unverified][avg 4.0]c:5 f:4 g:4 wl:4 rec:3currentworked: 2022 – 2023
The team laughed a lot. Meetings were focused but not grim.
2026-04-23[hard-verified · work email][avg 4.2]c:5 f:3 g:5 wl:5 rec:3formerworked: 2022 – 2022
PIP process was more supportive than punitive. The person who went through it actually recovered.
2025-08-07[hard-verified · work email][avg 4.0]c:5 f:3 g:5 wl:2 rec:5formerworked: 2023 – 2023
You would not survive here without strong writing. Async decisions ran on documents, not meetings.
2025-05-10[unverified][avg 3.6]c:5 f:2 g:3 wl:3 rec:5formerworked: 2022 – present
The team laughed a lot. Meetings were focused but not grim.
2025-04-20[soft-verified · web match][avg 4.0]c:5 f:4 g:4 wl:2 rec:5currentworked: 2024 – 2023
The team lead pushed back on our own leadership when the ask was unreasonable. That built a lot of trust.
2025-01-31[hard-verified · work email][avg 3.4]c:2 f:2 g:5 wl:3 rec:5formerworked: 2021 – 2022
Perks were fine. What kept me around was the manager and the team, not the snacks.
2024-10-27[unverified][avg 4.2]c:2 f:5 g:4 wl:5 rec:5currentworked: 2023 – present
The team rallied hard around launches. Post-launch reviews were fair, not just cheerleading.
2024-09-12[soft-verified · web match][avg 3.4]c:4 f:3 g:4 wl:2 rec:4formerworked: 2024 – 2024
The manager was technically strong but avoided hard conversations. Feedback came as a surprise every cycle.
2024-02-25[hard-verified · work email][avg 3.0]c:2 f:4 g:4 wl:3 rec:2formerworked: 2021 – present
The manager was technically strong but avoided hard conversations. Feedback came as a surprise every cycle.