Data · Lead

the numbers

n=6 · effective weight 6.52

communication

3.04

fairness

3.29

supports growth

3.17

work-life

2.67

would work for again

3.00

overall rating

3.03 / 5

confidence

0.611

σ 0.501

One rating per group per account. You may edit or delete from your dashboard.

2026-06-22[hard-verified · work email][avg 2.6]c:3 f:3 g:3 wl:2 rec:2currentworked: 2022 – 2024
When leadership changed, the whole vibe changed. Not worse, just different. Adjustment took a couple of quarters.
2026-05-14[soft-verified · web match][avg 3.6]c:2 f:5 g:4 wl:3 rec:4formerworked: 2021 – present
Levelling conversations happened openly. That took the mystery out of a lot of the promo cycle.
2025-09-24[unverified][avg 3.4]c:3 f:3 g:4 wl:3 rec:4currentworked: 2023 – 2024
The team lead pushed back on our own leadership when the ask was unreasonable. That built a lot of trust.
2025-02-27[soft-verified · web match][avg 2.4]c:4 f:2 g:2 wl:2 rec:2currentworked: 2021 – 2024
Work life was fine until quarter-end, then it was fine again. Nothing outrageous.
2024-09-21[unverified][avg 3.4]c:4 f:5 g:2 wl:4 rec:2currentworked: 2023 – 2022
Skip-levels were real and useful. My skip actually remembered what I said between meetings.
2024-04-22[soft-verified · web match][avg 3.4]c:4 f:2 g:4 wl:2 rec:5formerworked: 2024 – 2023
A lot of what worked here was because of one senior engineer. When they left, quality slipped for a year.