Engineering · Team Lead · Team Lead - Engineering

the numbers

n=5 · effective weight 7.2

communication

3.43

fairness

3.28

supports growth

3.31

work-life

3.53

would work for again

3.28

overall rating

3.37 / 5

confidence

0.798

σ 0.228

One rating per group per account. You may edit or delete from your dashboard.

2026-05-14[hard-verified · work email][avg 3.8]c:4 f:3 g:4 wl:4 rec:4currentworked: Q1 2020 – present
The org loved OKRs a little too much. Sometimes the ceremony became the work.
2026-04-23[unverified][avg 3.6]c:3 f:4 g:4 wl:4 rec:3formerworked: Q4 2019 – H2 2020
Some fair criticism: hiring outpaced onboarding capacity, and new folks felt lost for their first month.
2026-04-16[soft-verified · LinkedIn][avg 3.4]c:4 f:3 g:3 wl:4 rec:3formerworked: H1 2022 – Q3 2023
The org invested in tooling in a way most companies talk about but never actually do.
2026-01-19[hard-verified · work email][avg 3.2]c:3 f:4 g:3 wl:3 rec:3currentworked: Q4 2024 – present
The team laughed a lot. Meetings were focused but not grim.
2025-07-30[unverified][avg 3.6]c:4 f:3 g:3 wl:4 rec:4currentworked: 2021 – present
The lead treated the team like adults. That sounds low bar and it is not as common as it should be.