companies » IndiGo » group

Data · Head

Gurgaon · at IndiGo

the numbers

n=12 · effective weight 8.88

communication

3.30

fairness

3.47

supports growth

3.60

work-life

3.22

would work for again

3.47

overall rating

3.41 / 5

confidence

0.822

σ 0.357

worked in this group?

One rating per group per account. You may edit or delete from your dashboard.

what people said (n=12)

2026-03-19[soft-verified · web match][avg 3.2]c:3 f:3 g:3 wl:3 rec:4currentworked: 2022 – 2024
The team ran a real retro every two weeks and actioned things. First place I have seen retros be worth the time.
2026-03-14[soft-verified · web match][avg 4.0]c:4 f:5 g:5 wl:2 rec:4formerworked: 2024 – 2023
The lead protected the team from most of the leadership churn. That kept me sane through a rough year.
2025-10-03[unverified][avg 3.2]c:4 f:2 g:4 wl:4 rec:2currentworked: 2021 – 2023
Levelling conversations happened openly. That took the mystery out of a lot of the promo cycle.
2025-09-13[hard-verified · work email][avg 3.4]c:3 f:4 g:4 wl:3 rec:3formerworked: 2021 – 2025
You could push back on a decision without getting labelled difficult. That is rare, in my experience.
2025-04-26[soft-verified · web match][avg 4.2]c:5 f:4 g:3 wl:5 rec:4formerworked: 2021 – 2024
Cross-functional partners took forever to reply. Half the delays were just Slack silence.
2025-04-22[unverified][avg 3.6]c:3 f:3 g:3 wl:5 rec:4currentworked: 2021 – present
The manager pulled me into the harder conversations early instead of protecting me from them.
2025-03-04[unverified][avg 3.4]c:4 f:2 g:4 wl:2 rec:5formerworked: 2023 – 2025
The team gave feedback the way you want it: specific, private, and forward-looking.
2024-12-26[hard-verified · work email][avg 3.8]c:3 f:5 g:5 wl:4 rec:2currentworked: 2024 – present
Compensation review was more collaborative than any previous job. My concerns were listened to seriously.
2024-04-24[unverified][avg 3.2]c:2 f:5 g:4 wl:2 rec:3formerworked: 2022 – 2025
Peer reviews were the most useful signal I got. Manager reviews were a summary at best.
2024-03-20[unverified][avg 3.6]c:2 f:2 g:5 wl:4 rec:5formerworked: 2021 – 2022
Growth path for people managers was clear. IC path had gaps that were awkward to navigate.
2024-03-11[soft-verified · web match][avg 3.0]c:4 f:2 g:2 wl:2 rec:5currentworked: 2022 – 2025
One-on-ones were regular and actually about me, not just status updates.
2024-02-25[unverified][avg 3.4]c:2 f:4 g:2 wl:5 rec:4currentworked: 2022 – 2025
The manager owned the calendar and made sure interviews and heads-down work did not eat each other.