Engineering · Manager

the numbers

n=5 · effective weight 3.25

communication

3.43

fairness

3.19

supports growth

3.47

work-life

3.56

would work for again

3.10

overall rating

3.35 / 5

confidence

0.248

σ 0.78

One rating per group per account. You may edit or delete from your dashboard.

2026-01-11[unverified][avg 4.0]c:4 f:3 g:5 wl:5 rec:3currentworked: 2022 – 2025
Peer reviews were the most useful signal I got. Manager reviews were a summary at best.
2024-09-02[soft-verified · web match][avg 4.0]c:5 f:5 g:4 wl:3 rec:3currentworked: 2023 – present
Politics were quieter than I expected for a company this size. Refreshing after my last job.
2024-07-19[soft-verified · web match][avg 2.4]c:2 f:2 g:3 wl:3 rec:2formerworked: 2021 – 2022
Levelling was pretty conservative. External hires often came in above internal folks doing the same work.
2024-03-31[hard-verified · work email][avg 3.4]c:3 f:2 g:5 wl:4 rec:3formerworked: 2021 – 2025
The team did not hide from hard customer conversations. That was a good muscle to build.
2024-03-02[hard-verified · work email][avg 4.4]c:5 f:5 g:2 wl:5 rec:5currentworked: 2024 – present
Documentation was chaotic. Half the tribal knowledge lived in one senior engineers head.