Operations · Director

Mumbai · at LTIMindtree

the numbers

n=8 · effective weight 6.42

communication

2.56

fairness

3.54

supports growth

3.44

work-life

3.32

would work for again

2.95

overall rating

3.16 / 5

confidence

0.623

σ 0.446

One rating per group per account. You may edit or delete from your dashboard.

2026-05-23[hard-verified · work email][avg 3.2]c:2 f:5 g:4 wl:2 rec:3formerworked: 2024 – 2023
Perks were fine. What kept me around was the manager and the team, not the snacks.
2026-04-05[unverified][avg 3.0]c:2 f:3 g:4 wl:4 rec:2formerworked: 2022 – 2023
Sales and product were finally in the same room by the time I left. Not the case when I joined.
2026-02-19[unverified][avg 4.0]c:5 f:2 g:4 wl:5 rec:4currentworked: 2021 – 2022
The org rewarded delivery over polish. Sometimes I wished for the reverse on customer-facing work.
2025-04-10[unverified][avg 2.6]c:2 f:2 g:2 wl:5 rec:2formerworked: 2024 – 2022
The org rewarded delivery over polish. Sometimes I wished for the reverse on customer-facing work.
2024-08-07[unverified][avg 2.8]c:2 f:4 g:2 wl:2 rec:4formerworked: 2022 – present
Peer reviews were the most useful signal I got. Manager reviews were a summary at best.
2024-08-02[soft-verified · web match][avg 3.6]c:2 f:5 g:5 wl:3 rec:3currentworked: 2024 – present
I stayed longer than I planned because the people were good. Left when the people started leaving.
2024-07-18[hard-verified · work email][avg 3.2]c:2 f:5 g:2 wl:4 rec:3currentworked: 2024 – 2022
The team did not hide from hard customer conversations. That was a good muscle to build.
2024-06-28[unverified][avg 3.4]c:2 f:2 g:5 wl:5 rec:3currentworked: 2022 – 2022
Layoffs were handled with more care than average. The manager showed up for people afterwards.