Human Resources · IC · IC - Human Resources

the numbers

n=5 · effective weight 5.58

communication

3.24

fairness

3.51

supports growth

3.34

work-life

3.00

would work for again

3.11

overall rating

3.24 / 5

confidence

0.628

σ 0.2

One rating per group per account. You may edit or delete from your dashboard.

2026-01-25[unverified][avg 3.6]c:3 f:4 g:4 wl:3 rec:4formerworked: Q4 2023 – Q4 2024
Perks were fine. What kept me around was the manager and the team, not the snacks.
2026-01-16[soft-verified · LinkedIn][avg 3.2]c:3 f:4 g:3 wl:3 rec:3formerworked: Q2 2019 – Q3 2021
The manager gave real air cover during a customer escalation. I did not have to defend the team in public.
2026-01-01[soft-verified · LinkedIn][avg 3.4]c:4 f:4 g:3 wl:3 rec:3formerworked: 2021 – H1 2021
Bureaucracy grew every quarter. By the end you needed three approvals for a decision you used to make yourself.
2025-11-02[soft-verified · LinkedIn][avg 3.2]c:3 f:3 g:4 wl:3 rec:3formerworked: Q1 2020 – 2022
The team had strong opinions and expressed them. Debates were not personal, which was refreshing.
2025-10-27[unverified][avg 3.6]c:4 f:4 g:4 wl:3 rec:3formerworked: H1 2021 – 2023
Team norms were written down and revisited. That helped a lot when new folks joined.