General Management · IC · IC - General Management

the numbers

n=5 · effective weight 6.65

communication

3.52

fairness

3.09

supports growth

3.00

work-life

3.43

would work for again

3.34

overall rating

3.28 / 5

confidence

0.748

σ 0.2

One rating per group per account. You may edit or delete from your dashboard.

2026-05-29[unverified][avg 3.2]c:4 f:3 g:3 wl:3 rec:3currentworked: H2 2024 – present
Compensation lagged the market for engineers but the equity did well in the end.
2026-04-17[soft-verified · LinkedIn][avg 3.2]c:4 f:3 g:3 wl:3 rec:3currentworked: 2019 – present
Learning budget was real, not just a policy. I used mine every year and nobody blinked.
2026-02-17[hard-verified · work email][avg 3.4]c:3 f:3 g:3 wl:4 rec:4formerworked: Q4 2020 – 2021
The onboarding doc was old but every senior person made time to answer questions. That closed the gap.
2025-12-23[hard-verified · work email][avg 3.6]c:4 f:3 g:3 wl:4 rec:4currentworked: Q1 2019 – present
The team took the on-call log seriously. Nothing left the sprint without a root cause.
2025-11-06[unverified][avg 3.6]c:4 f:4 g:3 wl:4 rec:3currentworked: Q3 2023 – present
Growth path for people managers was clear. IC path had gaps that were awkward to navigate.