Consulting · Senior Manager · Senior Manager - Consulting

the numbers

n=5 · effective weight 7.21

communication

3.00

fairness

3.29

supports growth

3.21

work-life

3.19

would work for again

3.42

overall rating

3.22 / 5

confidence

0.764

σ 0.303

One rating per group per account. You may edit or delete from your dashboard.

2026-03-17[hard-verified · work email][avg 3.6]c:3 f:4 g:3 wl:4 rec:4currentworked: 2021 – present
The manager was technically strong but avoided hard conversations. Feedback came as a surprise every cycle.
2026-02-18[hard-verified · work email][avg 3.2]c:3 f:3 g:4 wl:3 rec:3formerworked: Q3 2020 – Q1 2022
Design and eng were treated as equals in the room. Roadmap arguments were actually productive.
2025-11-10[soft-verified · LinkedIn][avg 3.4]c:3 f:4 g:3 wl:4 rec:3formerworked: Q4 2019 – Q3 2021
Growth here was mostly through side-projects. If you waited for someone to hand you scope, you would wait a while.
2025-07-24[hard-verified · work email][avg 3.4]c:3 f:3 g:4 wl:3 rec:4currentworked: H2 2022 – present
The team was diverse in a way that felt structural, not decorative. Different backgrounds, different opinions, real debate.
2025-07-22[soft-verified · LinkedIn][avg 2.8]c:3 f:3 g:2 wl:2 rec:4formerworked: Q1 2024 – Q3 2024
Recruiting made promises about scope that the team could not keep. Set the wrong expectation on day one.