Finance · Manager · Manager - Finance

Bangalore · at Google

the numbers

n=5 · effective weight 7.16

communication

4.21

fairness

4.41

supports growth

4.11

work-life

3.92

would work for again

3.51

overall rating

4.03 / 5

confidence

0.785

σ 0.245

One rating per group per account. You may edit or delete from your dashboard.

2026-06-28[hard-verified · work email][avg 4.8]c:5 f:5 g:5 wl:5 rec:4formerworked: 2022 – Q4 2022
Levelling conversations happened openly. That took the mystery out of a lot of the promo cycle.
2026-02-04[hard-verified · work email][avg 4.4]c:5 f:5 g:4 wl:4 rec:4formerworked: 2022 – H2 2024
The team was diverse in a way that felt structural, not decorative. Different backgrounds, different opinions, real debate.
2025-10-24[soft-verified · LinkedIn][avg 4.4]c:5 f:5 g:4 wl:4 rec:4formerworked: 2022 – H2 2023
Half the team is contractors and it shows in how decisions get made. Full-timers are in a different room.
2025-08-12[unverified][avg 4.2]c:4 f:5 g:5 wl:4 rec:3currentworked: Q1 2021 – present
The lead was consistent. What they said in one-on-ones matched what they said in group settings. That built trust fast.
2025-07-18[hard-verified · work email][avg 4.2]c:4 f:5 g:5 wl:4 rec:3currentworked: Q3 2019 – present
The onboarding doc was old but every senior person made time to answer questions. That closed the gap.