Data · Manager · Manager - Data

Bangalore · at Microsoft

the numbers

n=5 · effective weight 7.5

communication

3.85

fairness

4.08

supports growth

3.87

work-life

4.09

would work for again

3.61

overall rating

3.9 / 5

confidence

0.743

σ 0.415

One rating per group per account. You may edit or delete from your dashboard.

2026-06-12[soft-verified · LinkedIn][avg 4.8]c:5 f:5 g:5 wl:5 rec:4currentworked: Q1 2023 – present
The lead was consistent. What they said in one-on-ones matched what they said in group settings. That built trust fast.
2026-05-19[hard-verified · work email][avg 3.8]c:4 f:3 g:5 wl:4 rec:3formerworked: Q4 2019 – Q3 2020
Promotions felt driven by visibility more than impact. Loud folks moved faster than quiet ones.
2026-04-27[hard-verified · work email][avg 4.4]c:4 f:5 g:4 wl:5 rec:4formerworked: H2 2021 – H1 2022
Attrition was low on this team while the wider org lost a lot of people. Something was clearly working.
2026-03-30[hard-verified · work email][avg 4.0]c:4 f:5 g:3 wl:4 rec:4formerworked: H2 2020 – H2 2022
Levelling was pretty conservative. External hires often came in above internal folks doing the same work.
2025-10-05[unverified][avg 4.6]c:4 f:5 g:4 wl:5 rec:5formerworked: Q3 2020 – H2 2020
The org invested in tooling in a way most companies talk about but never actually do.