Engineering · VP · VP - Engineering

the numbers

n=5 · effective weight 8.12

communication

3.14

fairness

3.33

supports growth

3.12

work-life

3.16

would work for again

3.29

overall rating

3.21 / 5

confidence

0.886

σ 0.228

One rating per group per account. You may edit or delete from your dashboard.

2026-05-14[hard-verified · work email][avg 3.6]c:3 f:4 g:3 wl:4 rec:4currentworked: H2 2020 – present
Levelling conversations happened openly. That took the mystery out of a lot of the promo cycle.
2026-03-23[soft-verified · LinkedIn][avg 3.0]c:3 f:3 g:3 wl:3 rec:3formerworked: 2023 – Q1 2024
I have never seen a group handle a security incident this cleanly. Everyone knew their role.
2026-03-18[hard-verified · work email][avg 3.2]c:3 f:4 g:3 wl:3 rec:3currentworked: H1 2024 – present
The onboarding doc was old but every senior person made time to answer questions. That closed the gap.
2025-11-01[hard-verified · work email][avg 3.2]c:4 f:3 g:3 wl:3 rec:3currentworked: H2 2023 – present
Learning budget was real, not just a policy. I used mine every year and nobody blinked.
2025-07-16[hard-verified · work email][avg 3.4]c:3 f:3 g:4 wl:3 rec:4formerworked: H1 2024 – H1 2024
The team celebrated wins in a way that felt real, not staged. Small thing but it mattered over a long stretch.